Analytical investigation

From fourteen issues out of cervical malignant tumors evaluating, feminine whose get had been ? 10 was indeed arbitrarily classified as the that have ‘a knowledge’ or else was regarded as having “not-good training”. Having expertise in HPV, female whoever respond to was ‘never ever heard about HPV’ was indeed excluded from the studies out of HPV degree.

From 5 issues, female whoever rating had been ? step 3 was indeed regarded as having ‘an effective expertise in HPV’ usually because ‘unhealthy knowledge’. From 19 questions, female whose score was in fact ? thirteen were categorized as the with ‘a good full knowledge’ if not given that ‘negative overall knowledge’.

Every analysis were compiled within the an electronic digital database and analyzed using SPSS V.twenty six.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to research group studies and was indeed summarized just like the wide variety with fee, suggest with practical deviation or median having variety. The fresh connection anywhere between for every adjustable and you can training get have been assessed using simple linear regression. Exploratory design was developed in the multivariable study also every parameters probably connected with the information and knowledge score. New believed level of analytical significance try a beneficial p-property value 0.05 otherwise smaller.

Performance

Regarding 500 women who found introduction standards and you may had been anticipate on data, you to definitely ong 499 ladies who taken care of immediately the fresh new survey on the degree regarding cervical cancer tumors and you may screening (part II) and you can understanding of HPV (area II), two don’t offer personal data. So demographic investigation was in fact available in simply 497 female (Dining table step 1). This new mean period of 497 players is actually age (SD ± ). More than half of your own professionals was indeed old Dining table step 1. Socio-financial feature en ukrainsk kvinde (N = 497).

The fresh evidence getting colposcopy was irregular cervical cytology which have exposure regarding HR-HPV (155; 29.2%), abnormal cytology having bad otherwise unknown regarding Hr-Hp (274; 55.1%), presence from only Hour-HPV (65; 13.1%), or merely history of CIN (3; 0.6%) (Dining table dos).

Predicated on for each and every matter on the cervical cancer evaluation (Table step three), 95.4% regarding 499 female misinterpreted that every female shall be processed having cervical malignant tumors (Q step 1). Around 55% so you’re able to 70% understood when to start and regularity regarding tests (Q dos–4). not, simply 17.4% and you may thirty six.3%had been conscious that new screening was not necessary after that–after hysterectomy to own low-cervical cancer tumors (Q 5) or just after 65 decades having reputation for consecutively regular early in the day research (Q six).

For the ways of evaluating (Q eight–14), 79% out-of participants were conscious there were of a lot examination tips (Q 7). not, just 7.2% had education that cervical tests might possibly be done during the time from pelvic test (Q 8). The players had been regularly cervical cytologic analysis (Q 10; 93.8%), HPV evaluation (Q 11; 89.2%), co-assessment (Q a dozen; ninety-five.4%) not having visual evaluation after acetic acidic (VIA) that has been identified in just 31.7% (Q nine). Also, 57.7% and 65.3% regarding members got misconception one cervical disease assessment would-be complete by imaging (Q 13) and you may bloodstream test to possess tumor markers (Q 14), respectively.

For knowledge of HPV, 110 players (20.0%) got never ever heard about HPV. Among left 389 members, vast majority (92.5%) realized that HPV illness is actually preventable and you will 85.1% was indeed conscious it’s avoidable by vaccination. Although majority (90.5%) knew one to cervical cancer stems from oncogenic HPV, merely approximately half realized it can easily be prevented by steering clear of sexual passion otherwise venereal wart stems from non-oncogenic HPV.

We reviewed knowledge of the players by the score (Desk cuatro). The newest mean millions of professionals to own experience with cervical malignant tumors tests (Letter = 499) as well as HPV (N = 389) have been ± dos.37 (away from fourteen issues) and you will step three.53 ± step 1.eleven (away from 5 concerns), correspondingly. Because of the categorization, twenty-six.9% and you will 20.1% had a beneficial knowledge of cervical cancer tumors screening and you can HPV correspondingly. The suggest share get of knowledge from the cervical cancer tumors evaluation and you will HPV had been ± 2.87 (of 19 issues), with just 25.2% got a good complete training.