Hypothesis 5
New complement of one’s five-foundation measurement model and also the relationship from the structural model was basically checked out on a couple of-action strategy out-of Anderson and you will Gerbing (1988). Until the architectural model study; the new standards regarding «Heterotrait-Monotrait (HTMT)» was used to examine brand new discriminant validity of the scales. It standard implies brand new resemblance levels of the dimensions throughout the measure. Just like the intersection circumstances of size move away from step one and you may approach 0, brand new discriminant authenticity increases and this worthy of is expected are below 0.9 (Tresses et al., 2017). The outcome taken from the research reveal that not one of one’s intersection points was indeed greater than 0.7, ergo discriminant authenticity try ensured (Desk 3).
In the first stage, brand new measurement model try checked out with respect to authenticity and you may precision having fun with confirmatory factor studies. The new SEM was utilized to check the brand new relationships regarding the structural design. S was used getting SEM. Model fit analytics have been reported when you look at the Table 2. The fit indicator suggest an advanced regarding design easily fit in dimension design (Sharma et al. 2005) (Table 4).
Gender, marital status, previous visits to Antalya and age were determined as control variables, based on the assumption that they significantly affect the relationships in the study. After comparing the measurement model (? 2 = 1.197,201, df = 317) with the structural model without control variables (? 2 = 1.417,612, df = 321), it was determined that the model created was consistent and significantly different (?? 2 = 220,411, df = 4, p < 0.05). Read More…